1. Yes, it's a whole new look! Have questions or need help? Please post your question in the New Forum Questions thread Click the X to the right to dismiss this notice
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Seeing tons of unread posts after the upgrade? See this thread for help. Click the X to the right to dismiss this notice
    Dismiss Notice

AC Systems and Energy Efficent Tax Credit

Discussion in 'Homeowners Corner' started by Ozgood, Aug 24, 2009.

  1. Ozgood

    Ozgood Not a space alien

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    Since many families are going to need to start thinking about replacing their HVAC systems due to the change in refrig. I wonder if a "Cash for ACs" would not be a good idea?

    Of course the HVAC industry does not have as big a lobby as the auto manufactures, but it could help out a lotta people as well as be green.

    But then this "Cash for X" mentality could go on forever. Every depressed industry will be asking for their own "Cash for (insert industry product here)" program.

    Don't think the tax payers would, or should, stand for that.

    "Cash for three-hole punches" Due to the increased interest in paperless offices and the use of digitalized documentation, the three-hole punch industry has suffered significant losses. :)
     
  2. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    It already exists.. tax credit for high efficency upgrades
    http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=tax_credits.tx_index
     
  3. lilpea

    lilpea Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    16
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    IMHO - It's not a well funded program. Example: To have both our AC/HVAC systems replaced the cost range is $18K-24K vs. getting a one time $1500 tax credit.
     
  4. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    I wouldn't mix it's requirements with how well it's funded..

    It's requirements are that you use a certain efficiency system. The fact it's a tax credit vs. rebate as well means for most people it's value is really more along the lines of $4500-$6000 in AGI.

    The fact you bought a much higher rated system, and both of the systems (and therefore spent more) I don't think has much relevance.

    You could have replaced just one, or cheaper systems, and gotten the same credit.
     
  5. lilpea

    lilpea Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    16
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    Valid point on the requirements.

    I think there is a misconception of what systems qualify and the # of tax credits one is allowed in this program. Specifically the program (on AC/HVAC) systems does not allow for multiple credits even if you replace multiple units. Again it is a one time allocation, except if you move physical addresses.

    Also I found that the majority of lower priced systems did not qualify for the federal tax credit so in order to get the 30% or max (1 time tax credit) of $1500, as a buyer you are forced to spend at least $8800 on a new HVAC system.

    That's why I think the program is poorly executed & funded.
     
  6. Ozgood

    Ozgood Not a space alien

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    Yikes so in order to save more you have to spend more? :huh:

    And if you have a dual zone system you can only get the tax credit on one? :huh::huh:

    Or can I replace one unit in 2010 get the tax credit, and then replace the second unit in 2011 and get the tax credit for the second unit??
     
  7. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    I'm familiar with the system and it's requirements.. as I just replaced a AC system myself and the credits were part of the buying decision.

    Given you can't install a lower then 13 SEER system anymore, the 'upsell' to get the credit is not very much at all. What more plays more a factor is, if must you replace both the AC and furnace to get to the efficiency you need.. Leading people to spend more then maybe they originally intended.

    But even if you take your $8800 number.. the tax credit is equivalent to well over a 50% discount. I think that is quite substantial.

    Even at spending 18k.. this is equivalent to a 25+% discount. That is damn significant.

    Or are you more put off that the credit is capped?

    The point about multiple units isn't misleading if you look at what the program is at the top level - it's not about AC, its about energy efficent upgrades. The program isn't about buying one category of products, but up to 1500 credit for spending on any of these products.

    You don't get $1500 on windows.. and then $1500 on AC, etc. It's total tax credit on energy efficient upgrades. An AC unit is just one of the things you can spend on.
     
  8. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    Depends - what must you do to get a certain effiency? In the case of AC systems.. an AC unit is defendant on the furnace as well (because that is where the blower is) so an AC unit can only achieve a certain efficiency on it's own. Higher levels are only achievable with a more capable furnace system.


    No, the program is about getting a tax credit on spending on energy efficient systems - not per system.

    No, the law is for spending in 2009 and 2010 only, and the credit is 30% of your expenditure up to a maximum of $1,500. The program is a 2 year program, not one.. so it's capped at $1,500 over the 2 years.
     
  9. Ozgood

    Ozgood Not a space alien

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    Well that seems pretty clear. Thanks :(
     
  10. lilpea

    lilpea Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    16
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    I could see a 50% discount if you only purchased a portion of an HVAC system.

    In our case we looked at 2 entire HVAC (AC & Heat) systems which drove the cost up to a minimum $8800 per unit that qualified, the high end of the quotes for qualifying units was $11,850 per unit.

    I don't understand the math on your 25% discount - could you explain that or am I doing the math wrong?

    2 HVAC systems @ a unit cost of $9832 (just pulled up the actual invoice for Whitman Mech) = $19,664
    Less $1500 federal energy tax credit is more like a 7.6% discount.

    I would say my issue with the program is the cap & time limit for the energy Energy Tax Credit. IMO - this limits homeowners to their scope of improvements and makes consumers choose one item such as windows, roof, water heater or HVAC vs. doing multiple projects.

    The other issue I have with the Cash For Clunkers program is it seems like double dipping, the tax payers are already on the hook for the auto bail outs.
     
  11. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    It's simple... you get a tax credit of up to 30% of your cost on qualifying energy efficient purchases. The credit is capped at $1,500 for the life of the program. The program is good for purchases made in 2009-2010. So if you spend at least $5,000 in qualified purchases, you can take the credit up to it's maximum.

    The discussion about having to replace your whole AC, etc is not really specific to this program at all. It's simply that AC systems only reach a certain efficiency without matching components in the furnace side of the system. Your typical builder grade, or 10+ year old system can not reach the high efficiency ratings by replacing the AC components alone, they are held back by the furnace side.

    For AC work to be a qualified purchase, the system must have a resulting efficency ratings of
    EER >=13
    SEER >= 16

    A SEER of 16 or higher isn't possible without the furnace side being a more modern, variable system. This is why most people can't just go and buy a AC coil and condenser, and qualify for the tax credit. You could if your furnace were modern, but the stuff you probably have in place wouldn't be able to do it.

    You are looking at is as this were a cash rebate instead of a tax CREDIT. This is a tax credit, which comes right off the bottom line of what you owe in taxes. So if you normally pay about 25% in taxes.. this $1,500 tax credit is equivalent to $6000 in your normal income.

    Uncle Sam saying you owe $1,500 less in taxes is like him saying 'here is a $6,000 tax deduction'. Assuming your net tax is about 25%.

    A tax credit is by far the most lucrative type of benefit the government can give you.. as it's benefit you can take ON TOP OF all your other tax wizardry and still get the full face value of it.

    Curious on the system you selected Pea... did you end up getting a 90 or 95 % efficient furnace? We too got a Carrier Infinity system, but chose not to upgrade to the higher efficiency furnaces and stuck with a 80% one in part due to costs and duct work required.
     
  12. lilpea

    lilpea Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    16
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    We are also going with the Carrier Infinity system, we also found the 90 95% EF Furnace was too costly and would require additional duct work as well as drywall repair.

    So we opted for the following for both zones:
    Furnace 58CVA979012 80% 70,000 BTUs,
    AC #CNPVP4217
    #24ANA136 Puron SEER21
    Lenox HC16 Media Air Cleaner.

    Did you all get the Carrier $1,000 cash rebate for each unit as well?

    The real bite in the butt is our house is only 5 years old and we never thought we would already be replacing both units. But over the last 2 winters out heat has gone out 5 times (not a good thing when our little guy was an infant) and this summer our AC has gone out 2.

    Thanks for the explanation on the %, when we check with our financial advisor he told us it really wouldn't have that much of an impact for us, but it was still "free money" and we shouldn't snub our noses at it.
     
  13. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    Well, the tax credit is similar to the one (at least for now) we get for a child tax credit which is huge.

    Yes, we are getting the carrier $1k rebate as well.

    We have dual zones, one AC unit is 12+ years old, the other is 8+ years old. The older one kicked the bucket, went dry, and blew the compressor. Both were Carrier systems. Since the other system is still working, we chose not to replace both, but only replace the failed system. To get the tax credit, and be able to tap into some of the benefits of the newer systems, we chose to replace both the AC and furnace in the failed system.

    We were debating between an American Standard (Trane) system being quoted by M.E. Flow and a Carrier Infinity System quoted by Climatic.

    We went with a 3 Ton 17 SEER Two-Stage Carrier Infinity system, with the 80% 60k/90k 2 Stage Furnace. The product families are the same as you quoted, but the model #s will vary based on size, etc. We have a media cabinet installed, but it's nothing fancy but the 4" filter box. We didn't throw on any of the extras.

    We shopped a few contractors, but Sunny at Climatic stepped up to win the deal. They've been great to deal with, very responsive, very personal service, and I think we ended up with a good price. Additionally, we have a 10y parts AND labor warranty, so I'm hoping we have the piece of mind for a long time to come.
     
  14. lilpea

    lilpea Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    16
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    That's good point/analogy on the tax credit, sadly we haven't been able to use a tax credit for our kid (yet). US-CIS & SSA didn't get us a SS# for him until a few months ago, I guess that explains why our financial guy didn't bring up the value of the credit.

    And by the way I have to admit...I am SO JEALOUS...sounds like you got the hybrid Carrier system, we looked at it but it was out of our price range.

    IMO - Trane is a very quite system and has great ratings, but it was the warranty that fell short. After digging I found that the parts are covered for 10 years, but labor isn't. We had a Carrier in our old TH and I loved it, when they extended their warranty to 10 years it defiantly swayed us.
     
  15. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    Tax Credits are few and far between... love them when you can get them :)

    On the warranty.. everyone is playing catch-up on the 10 year parts warranty stuff. The Trane quote we had, covered both parts AND labor - while the Carrier system was parts only.

    That was part of our decision process.. the Trane system we were looking at was cheaper, but only a single stage system, but had a better warranty.. which made the decision kind of hard. Climatic made the choice easier for us by leveling the warranty by increasing the Carrier Warranty to 10ys P&L. This was why in part we went with Climatic and the Carrier system. We got the warranty we wanted, with the nicer system, at (what I think was..) a good price.
     
  16. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    moved all the AC posts into their own thread...
     
  17. vacliff

    vacliff "You shouldn't say that."

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    344
    The tax credit is why I'm probably going to get some replacement windows.
     
  18. hells_bells

    hells_bells New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    $8k is a bit high I think. We were getting quotes around $6k from Bowmans for a units (a/c + furnace) that qualified
     
  19. flynnibus

    flynnibus Well-Known Member Forum Staff

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    250
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    Curious which make and size are these units?

    I think the lowest quote we had for a combined system that was in the range that qualified was $7600... but that was an American Standard unit, so at least it was a top shelf brand (Trane).

    We only had one quote that was one of the lower brands (Amana) but that quote was for AC only and was in the 6k range! Way overpriced
     
  20. eam

    eam New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: Cash for Clunkers: Poster Child For Unintended Consequences

    We also had to replace A/C & Furnace recently - had several quotes all selling the same equipment. We also went with Sonny at Climatic and have been very happy with the experience. Very personal service, everyone that came to the house was friendly & respectful, and we were quite happy with the final price.
     

Share This Page